Tuesday 7 July 2015

La controverse

Dirty Corner château de Versailles Kapoor
The title of this post says it all: controversy is the word in town about 'Dirty Corner', one of Anish Kapoor's summer exhibits in the palace gardens, on the lawn connecting the palace to the Grand Canal. Also dubbed 'the queen's vagina', it has recently been vandalised. Vigils have been held outside the palace to demand its removal. VDP will remain neutral here, since the purpose of this blog is not to discuss what is or isn't art, but merely to show the city!

Le titre de ce billet résume la situation au sujet de "Dirty Corner", l'une des œuvres d'Anish Kapoor exposées dans les jardins du château en cet été 2015. Récemment appelée "le vagin de la reine", l'installation a été vandalisée et des veillées ont eu lieu pour demander son retrait. VDP restera neutre ici, puisque l'objet de ce blog n'est pas de débattre de ce qui est ou n'est pas de l'art mais juste de montrer la ville au quotidien.
Dirty Corner château de Versailles Kapoor
Dirty Corner château de Versailles Kapoor

30 comments:

  1. It does seem very out of place.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like the top picture, not so sure about the artwork and don't know what to say about the Queens bits....

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you are smart to remain neutral in this case, Ciel! I'm not sure about this piece at all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It like a big potato chip!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yikes! I will stay out of it, too. I am surprised that this artwork was chosen to display. Someone goofed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like art that challenges the viewer, even gets in your face. It doesn't have to be pretty. I'd love to see this for myself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. amazing unusual but not very appealing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How funny . I love it. What is shocking about a vagina ? Maybe people.have 'dirty thoughts' , they seem not to be open minded in asking the removal. And art is art , no discussion about that.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting that the city would choose this work to display at the height of the tourist season. But I think art does its job when it gets people talking!

    ReplyDelete
  10. No controversy here: that's crap and it is in an absolutely wrong place. The world-famous 'artist' is good to sell his 'wares': the fools are those who allow this, and often pay for it with public money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Art has many faces , it's not only Michelangelo . Your opinion is only yours.

      Delete
  11. @ VP: while there is slightly less information about this year's exhibition, usually the palace's exhibitions are financed by sponsors.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wait, so what did the vandals do? I'm having trouble distinguishing the vandalism from the "art."

    ReplyDelete
  13. It certainly provides a contrast in styles and if controversy and publicity was the artists aim then its achieved that too.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous7/7/15 10:43

    I think art can be controversial regardless of where or what it is!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Well it's different that's for sure :) Still, it's only temporary oui?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Un bon moyen de faire venir les gens pour voir l’exposition et de faire des gros sous, je me demande ce qui va suivre l’année prochaine comme exposition (faire parler de soi n’est pas si facile) mais ce n’est pas moi qui me déplacerai…

    ReplyDelete
  17. It's an interesting installation. I'm wondering if the biggest controversy is about where it is placed not necessarily about the piece itself. Placed somewhere else, it might not draw so much attention but in front of that famous palace it provokes a lot of emotion.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Well, it's different. I think the name is pretty funny. Does it deserve to be removed? I don't think so, nor do I think it deserve to be vandalized.

    ReplyDelete
  19. i don't like it there...it looks really out of place and i am laughing at the name :D

    ReplyDelete
  20. Well, I've go dog in this fight, so I'll just say it: It's ugly as hell and should be thrown out of there for it makes Versailles look ugly!

    Now, I'm going to get a cold beer!

    ReplyDelete
  21. I don't think I like it - at least, not in Versailles.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I like this huge trumpet. And it realy makes noise!

    ReplyDelete
  23. gotta love that title ;-)
    fun to see what gets people up in a roar
    if only people would roar over starving people, or wars, or or or!
    thanks for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Very special art there.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I had to look twice to be sure what exactly I was seeing. Personally, I hope it isn't a permanent display. The vantage point in your first shot is quite amazing.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I sooo agree with Tammie Lee. :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. I agree it is for us to show our city/town/village the good the bad and the ugly and leave persona taste aside. It would be easy to only post and highlight the best views, but this is part of your area. It's not my taste, but it is interesting to see the unusual image and not the tourist shot.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I know that they have to attract as many visitors as possible, but this seems a failure in every possible way. There aren't that many fans of this kind of installation, not compared to fans of Versailles; and then to impose this jarring discordance on the main vista can only deeply offend those who have travelled from all around the world for one chance to see the place!

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for visiting and leaving a thought! Sorry about the moderation, a bit tired of spam at the moment!

Merci de votre visite très appréciée et de laisser une pensée ! Désolée de devoir modérer vos commentaires, VDP en a un peu marre des spammeurs en ce moment !